Per the syllabus, when assigned, you will each be responsible for contributing to an online discussion on this blog. For full credit each post will need to include a quote from the book, even in response to another comment.
Friday, March 13, 2009
collective responsibility
Arendt opens this weeks reading with collective guilt and responsibility. Although I do not come in close contact with gilt while doing service learning at the hospital, I see collective responsibility in affect. At the end of the day the whole hospital is responsible for how patients have been treated and how many survive. No doctor is blamed for what might have gone wrong. That is not the way a hospital gets its reputation, in fact it is through collective responsibility. Even though I am not a doctor or nurse and can not practice directly on patients, while I serve at the hospital I have the responsibility of maintaining all codes of conduct and enforcing our mission. The hospital as a whole is “held responsible for what has been done in its name” (149). It is the community Arendt gives an example of on page 150 and describes that we cannot live without a community. I can leave the hospital community, but without a doubt I will be entering another and exchanging "one kind of responsibility for another" (150). This goes further to prove that we all work together and without our togetherness we would not have the communities that help us thrive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes, and this makes sense as Arendt says that the idea of collective guilt can only be metaphorical anyway. It is collective responsibility which is REAL and can be lived within our communities. If we don't practice this understanding in one community then eventually we will have to leave, probably. Her point being that the only way of getting away from this interconnection/obligation to others is to go live in a cave! So, if we want to live with others, we must ultimately embrace some understanding of being responsible for collective actions. If we don't stand up to wrong, then we are implicated also. It's a hard one but the principle makes sense. We can't just shrug off a wrong that is committed in our midst. If we don't act to stop it or right it, what happens?
ReplyDelete